The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stodacom[edit]

Stodacom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and no reasonable assertion of notability. Highly promotional - reads like and advertisement . No external refs  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   11:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.--Dmol (talk) 11:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt. This advertisement has been speedily deleted three times already: ....has three lines of business services: Business due diligence, Insurance claims verifications, employment screening and Computer forensics investiagtions. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• delete—per above, although perhaps we should consider the fact that it is "among the best known in town"?— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 07:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.