The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stockmann, Tampere

[edit]
Stockmann, Tampere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Original reasoning was: While the company is undoubtedly notable, not every individual location of it is. There are not enough sources available about this location specifically to justify a standalone article about it. The Finnish article has only one independent source, and it's an announcement about renovations being complete.

De-PROD reason was "if it's Finland's second oldest department store then it's probably notable", but this reasoning conflates the location with the company. The Stockmann company is undoubtedly notable. However, just being its second oldest location is not inherently notable in the absence of any sources that consider it to be of historical interest. ♠PMC(talk) 05:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.