The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails the relevant notability guidelines due to a lack of substantial coverage. ~ mazca ^talk 17:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Holter[edit]

Steve Holter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable vanity page, created by subject User talk:F1steveuk. Unreferenced, nothing to support notability beyond authorship of one out-of-print book. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, no notability, no sources.--Talain (talk) 22:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, one book published is not sufficient for notability. --Pgallert (talk) 12:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:ATHLETE. Iowateen (talk) 21:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.