The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a "Wikipedia is not a book"? —Largo Plazo (talk) 01:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete-- G12. This seems close enough to this to look like a copyright violation. Mandsford (talk) 02:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And Wikipedia is not a place for one's own origianl research, webpage, or project (term paper or, in this case, a book). Wikipedia is supposed to be a place where people write articles in their own words and improve upon their skills. The more I read Chapter 5 of Stereotypes and Stereotyping by C. Neil Macrae, Charles Stangor, Miles Hewstone (Guilford Press, 1996) ISBN 1572300531, 9781572300538, the more nauseated I get. Mandsford (talk) 02:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete nonsense/essay/almost certain copyvio. JJL (talk) 02:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. This is the most blatant case of plagiarism I've seen on WP. "Copyvio" is too nice a word, really. Oh, yes, delete of course, and perhaps the Hammer can send over some of his otters to bite this person. Drmies (talk) 02:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to concerns on violations of copyright.--Lenticel(talk) 02:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G12) — Blatant copyright infringement as noted above. MuZemike (talk) 03:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deleted as copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 03:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.