The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Thorpe[edit]

Hoax article about non-existent physicist. I can find no independent evidence online for any of the supposed research articles by this physicist. Page creator has removed hoax tag multiple times without attempting to substantiate claims or providing reliable sourcing. Scog (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an almost certain hoax. At the very least there are no reliable sources to verify notability. It is the authors responsibility to add those sources and especially as there are no obvious sources to support his claims. The article was full of potential BLP concerns which I removed. -JodyB_talk 13:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as a hoax and also salt it because of constant removal of tags by author. Doc Strange (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete hoax Xxanthippe (talk) 09:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Speedy Delete blatant hoax - the Cambridge Journal of Physics doesn't exist and neither do the articles Teleomatic (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per everyone elses reasons. TheProf07 (talk) 16:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.