The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under G7. — ξ^xplicit 07:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Hegedus[edit]

Stephen Hegedus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Ultra-minor political candidate, no significant coverage. A Google search yields nothing of interest and there are no other claims to notability. Frickeg (talk) 12:03, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Frickeg (talk) 12:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, fair enough mate - just delete it. I wasn't fully aware of the notability provisions and was just seeing what I could play around with. Am a relatively new user to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istvan09 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 30 July 2010

In that case, tagged as ((db-author)). Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.