The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Cudlitz (scientist and inventor)[edit]

I can find no indication of notability either in the article or by searching. He's listed as having three patents, but with no claim that they're more significant than thousands of others; the only other claim to fame in the article is having worked on various engineering projects, but none give the impression of being major enough to confer notability just for that.

The links in the article are to self-published websites or don't give significant coverage. The only other sources I can find are this obituary and this article, which seems to be quoting his opinion about something rather than covering him in any depth (though feel free to correct me if you can get through the NYT paywall). Olaf Davis (talk) 09:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a single obituary in a local paper isn't enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of any notability Corpx (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.