The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, until such time as there are sources to assert notability. Pastordavid (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

StarMUD[edit]

Non-notable online game; no third-party sources to establish notability. De-prodded with promise of more content, but none came. Percy Snoodle (talk) 16:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It seems to be WP:OR. There are no independent reliable sources to suggest otherwise. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 02:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable within the genre, one of the big ol' classics. Paper sources from the early '90s have covered this. User:Krator (t c) 10:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if references to those sources were be added to the article I would withdraw the nomination. Percy Snoodle (talk) 12:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I would love to have an article on this, one of my favouriate MUDs (from back when I used to play them) but we've been waiting for independent references for some time now. Delete and rewrite from scratch using WP:V when reliable coverage materializes. Marasmusine (talk) 14:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete - people say this is notable but I haven't seen anyone provide the evidence. the burden of proof is on the person to establish notability. Cackalackakilla (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.