The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spume Island[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google Books returns only 14 hits, none of which appear to discuss this location in any depth. This island does not appear to qualify as notable by the terms of WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Also see Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability. KDS4444 (talk) 07:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Castles and islands simply are notable. And it is even apparently named by the United Kingdom Antarctic Place-names Committee. --do ncr am 18:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per WP:GEOLAND. Smartyllama (talk) 03:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.