The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete - No assertion of notability (CSD A7) J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilertv[edit]

Spoilertv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable website with literally no external coverage. A Google search only brings up a large number of posts on various forums attempting to promote the website. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 15:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nom. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 15:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per similar concerns. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 15:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A rather new website that fails WP:WEB. Only 3 minor hits in GoogleNews[1].Nsk92 (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• A7 Doesn't even assert notability. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.