The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speyside Cooperage[edit]

Speyside Cooperage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Declined speedy. May meet criteria for inclusion, but is not a speedy candidate, as it asserts notability - just. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. I've added a couple of sources and an image I found on Commons, but haven't the time now to search for further sources, though it looks as though they're out there. Recommending weak keep for now, since this appears to be one of the larger operations of its kind in Britain, as well as a popular tourist attraction. Deor (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Added another source, found on BBC. Thanks for your support, Deor. Abrax5 (Talk) 00:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Has sufficient sources for a stub with the possibility of more to be found[1][2][3] (N.B. I have visited this place.) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.