The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite 18:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist Party of North Carolina[edit]

Delete No evidence of current existence. The party's "chairman" seems to have become a Democrat[1]. Shlomo411 (talk) 19:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, wikipedia is not only about currently existing parties, but also have articles on now defunct parties. according to the article text, SPNC has had a separate existence outside SPUSA, and deserves a separate article. --Soman (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Do we delete articles about Albert Einstein? We do not delete artices just because they may happened in the past. Warrior4321^talkContribs 22:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete without third-party resources asserting notability. It's hard to see how this deserves its own article, given that there's no evidence it currently exist or did anything noteworthy other than once existing.  Xihr  23:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 00:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 00:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:ORG not met. I may reconsider if significant coverage in secondary sources materializes, but I rather doubt it will. RayAYang (talk) 00:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.