The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn per changes made by Barberio (talk · contribs) and per one of the nominees being converted into a redirect. Non-admin closing. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 21:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Social Level Marketing[edit]

Contested prod. Speedy G11 was also declined. Original research. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 11:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating:

Tentative Rewrite and Keep - From a trivial Google search, Social Level Marketing does appear to be a real marketing technique now being used. I found one clear cite that it's now being used as an 'industry term' [1]. --Barberio (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It would need a complete rewrite, since your source talks about something totally different than the article. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - May well be, but we don't delete things for needing a complete rewrite, we turn it into a stub and mark it as needing work. --Barberio (talk) 13:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - And I've done the work on stubifying it, redirecting one to the other, and with two sources to verify it's a real marketing technique. Any objections to speedy closing with keep now? --Barberio (talk) 12:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - No. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 21:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.