The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SNOW, unanimous keep decision by commenters, nomination withdrawn. Mgm|^(talk) 14:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Snuggie[edit]

Snuggie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod on a poorly referenced article on a non-notable item. Borders on spam. Rtphokie (talk) 12:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Not notable? USA Today did a story about them: [1].SPNic (talk) 13:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Articles in USA Today and Time Magazine are hardly poor references. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article is well-sourced and written from a NPOV. I've been watching it for the last month, and I think that it has become a good example of what a stub should look like. Theymos (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- I added the USAToday source myself, and the other reference certainly indicates notability. That, plus the mentions by the likes of Jay Leno & Ellen Degeneres indicate clear notability. Umbralcorax (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- Existing references assert notability and there has been significant media coverage [2]. --Aka042 (talk) 15:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Pile-on Keep Significantly covered, well-known product in the US. Townlake (talk) 15:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- The Snuggie is notable, I've seen commercials for it on TV.Cssiitcic (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowball Keep Notability is very easily confirmed. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Just the thing when it's snowing. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawn I guess it's snowballed, dutifully withdrawn. Now will some of you people please go make this article suck a little less since you think it's so notable?--Rtphokie (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.