The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Skulpt[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough notable for wikipedia. it is too early for now coverage is typical in press. It seems only intention of writing this article for marketing and promotional purposes or do some link building exercise. Light2021 (talk) 12:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article references are a mixture of brief start-up funding / product coverage along with articles about Electrical impedance myography in general. Aside from coverage of a similarly-named spa, a synth and a Python implementation, there are routine listings for this product's iOS and Android app (with fewer than 200 reviews in total) and some brief coverage but I don't see the coverage needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.