The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sirawata[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced and no indication of WP:notability. Google searches not finding anything mentioning Sirawata and Jats. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I found the Jats, and Sirawata is listed on List of Jat clans. I agree it does need references, maybe someone more familiar with the subject or who speaks Hindi could be more successful in finding one.Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It was added to the list of Jat clans by the editor that created this article. This article was created as it would be removed from the list without an article. noq (talk) 18:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 13:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced and impossible to verify. Delete with no prejudice to recreate if sources are found. --regentspark (comment) 21:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Still on the fence about this... no strong policy guidelines to support either. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theo polisme 17:07, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Though this caste (or sub caste) may exist but I find no mention of it in reliable sources that can indicate its notability. --SMS ^Talk 16:28, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.