The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 10:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sincretics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Unreferenced article about what appears to be a New Age concept to do with "inner vision" (apparently not the same as Syncretism). Nothing relevant on Google. Fails WP:RS, WP:FRINGE andy (talk) 14:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Maybe the term itself is a personal translation of something in a foreign language, but that's difficult to say as there are no references. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.
Delete. Original research, a non-notable neologism for some sort of visualization technique: Sincretical images are continuously-associative and can be decoded by linguistically developed brain. The images are visualized by the sincretical algorithm of the brain and are stored in the special storage for the sincretics. All correctly visualized images can be latter retrieved and analyzed; it’s not possible to remove all the images from the storage. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:27, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete The article makes unsubstantiated claims about alleged brain functions. This is fringe science and should be deleted. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.