- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. per consensus (non-admin closure) Nightfury 08:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Simplii Financial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- I hate to be that guy and despite the fact I am in favout of Keep, I need to remind you of WP:OTHERSTUFF. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'd give it some time, as PC Financial doesn't merge into Simplii Financial until November 1, and we should see some more sources by then. However, in it's current state, I don't think it would survive deletion. –Miles Edgeworth Talk 17:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Taking over from PC Financial. It's basically a re-brand. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (Note: I am the editor which turned User:Daylen's redirect into an article) - Currently subject of coverage from multiple independent and reliable sources, local and national, with depth going beyond simply the announcement of the new division (i.e. commentary from researchers and analysts on implications) meeting Wikipedia:ORGCRIT. As Miles noted above, more coverage will likely occur following the formal transfer of PCF's banking customers to Simplii in November. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this article, but redirect President's Choice Financial to it post Nov 1. The latter is pure promo / sales brochure, and the article under discussion would actually be an improvement. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Nov 1st comments above. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Hard Keep this article - 1 Nov 17 will be a key date on which this new banking enterprise will begin functioning, affecting the entire Canadian banking landscape.Cpt ricard (talk) 21:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. When it earns its own article, then fine, but all this talk of "soon to redefine Canadian banking" sounds a bit WP:CRYSTAL for an article at this time. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.