The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), because notability is confirmed (quality, however, is another matter). Ecoleetage (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Sez[edit]

Simon Sez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

An unremarkable film which made only $292,000 at the US box office. IMDB listing gives it a mediocre 2/10 rating and the privilege of being granted the No.61 spot among its Bottom 100 shows of all time. The only thing notable are its actors but the film is not in the same category Artene50 (talk) 09:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep has received significant reviews in major newspapers including New York Times, Los Angeles Times and Dallas morning news thus meeting the relevant notability guideline - Wikipedia:Notability (films). Davewild (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per WP:Notability (films). --Cameron (T|C) 17:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Might be lousy but it came out in American theaters, on VHS/DVD, makes regular appearances on ActionMAX at 4:30am in the morning, and made some money. Definitely meets WP:N/FILMS. Nate • (chatter) 22:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notability is not a "positive" notability only requirement. If it's notoriously bad, the nominator him/herself established it's notability, so no reason to delete. --Blechnic (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.