The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under A7 by Sphilbrick (non-admin closure) ///EuroCarGT 03:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shishaldin[edit]

Shishaldin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally non-notable person. Could have been A7-ed, but it's been here a while so we'll take this route. I looked but can't find anything even remotely reliable about this person; the "reference" given is a kind of press release. Drmies (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nothing out there, just a few blogs and non-RS material. The rest is related to the mountain. Fails WP:CREATIVE. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Of course, per Peridon below. Someone trout me. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Zero notability, and kudos to the good Doctor for doing this the right way. Joefromrandb (talk) 04:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect, obviously. I'll get in line for a trout-slap. Joefromrandb (talk) 07:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Limited context, subject fails notability. ///EuroCarGT 04:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect, ugh, looks like I need a trout slap as well. ///EuroCarGT 03:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm leaning toward deletion. I saw a few scattered mentions throughout blogs, such as BoingBoing.net. This article does seem to indicate that her wacky antics did catch the attention of bloggers back when she was a student, but I don't see any evidence of significant coverage. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete - so tagged. ukexpat (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was entirely unhelpful. Drmies could have obviously A7'ed it himself; there was no reason to request speedy deletion in the middle of an open AfD. I have asked the deleting administrator User:Sphilbrick to restore the page, pending the result of this AfD. Joefromrandb (talk) 07:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Why not just redirect to the mountain? Peridon (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.