The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete No notability, and reads like an advert. What a horrible page. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There isn't any evidence of anything about this person, other than the self promotion. (jarbarf) (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.