The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: G. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Ginsberg[edit]

Sharon Ginsberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't establish notability. TTN (talk) 02:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 02:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree, this article lacks any sources or references whatsoever. Longevitydude (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless reliable sources/references that establish notability can be found and added to the article. TouhouFan9801 (talk) 05:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: G. BOZ (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Thanks for the idea, I for one would happily consider a merge. Longevitydude (talk) 23:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per BOZ. That list exists for characters like this. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per above discussion. Subject is more suited for the list rather than a separate article. Aoba47 (talk) 15:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: G. The character is certainly not notable enough for her own article, but as she's already listed in the appropriate section of the master Marvel Comics character list, merging the content there is an appropriate action. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge as above. I'm not sure I see the utility of a relist in this case; I think it's clear what the consensus is! Josh Milburn (talk) 22:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and close per everything J Milburn just said. Jclemens (talk) 15:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.