The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --jonny-mt 03:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sharking[edit]

Sharking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism, original research, unreferenced, and I cannot find any sources online after having tried searching that are reliable and mention this form of sexual assault. All of this suggests that this article should be deleted. Certainly not worth a standalone article. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 09:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nearly all Google results are from forums. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 20:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to delete this article. It is very accurate. Many video sites have this kind of sexual assaults tagged as sharking. It is important to inform everyone what this kind of unacceptable behavior is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.68.96 (talk) 00:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a non-notable neologism. I was unable to find any decent sources to validate or show the notability of this term. In fact, I saw the term used to mean different things, which is one of the classic reason why articles on neologisms are problematic.--Kubigula (talk) 22:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No definitive definition from a reliable source (not from a forum!), no article. B.Wind (talk) 02:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.