The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --VS ^talk 06:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shannon Moore and Jimmy Wang Yang[edit]

Shannon Moore and Jimmy Wang Yang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Wrestling tag team in WWE; articles already exist for both members and the team together does not appear to be notable, as a team like The Outsiders are. No belts won, no team name, no coverage out of universe, no article, IMHO. CastAStone/^/(talk) 15:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails WP:NN. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 16:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom; fails WP:N. LonelyBeacon (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as a member of WP:PW it is completely non notable. NiciVampireHeart (talk) 06:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral - I dont know, but this team has been teaming up for several months now and are the number one contenders for the WWE Tag Team Championship. It probably should be deleted per what is above and mayby recreated later, but for now im on both sides.TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 06:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per below comments. They become even more notable if they win the tag belts this Tuesday (when they face the champs). TJ Spyke 23:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment - I also feel with some work this article can be turned into at least a start class, similar to the Major Brothers.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 06:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• They have been teaming for quite some time now and are a regular tag team (not just two random guys temporarily teaming), partially because WWE seems to have forgotten about the cruiserweight division since the title was vacated in September. The problem is that the article doesn't have any third party sources. They are notable as a tag team though. TJ Spyke 06:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The two aformentioned wrestlers are indeed a tag team, and have solely concentrated their in ring competition in the tag team division since WWE seemingly retired the Cruiserweight division last year. They are pretty notable as they are feuding with the WWE Tag Team Champions (becoming the #1 tag team on Smackdown!). The article should be kept and supplied with sources afterwards. Feedback ^☎ 09:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above Jordan Morrison Payne 10:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This seems to be happening a lot lately. Two wrestlers who team together, even for a few months, don't necessarily become notable as a tag team because of it. There's hundred of possible combinations you could say are viable articles, but things like this will lead to even less notable teams being considered. IF they win the tag championships, sure, give them an article. Otherwise, they have no name, no major coverage, and their individual articles should be able to cover everything. AdaManiac 11:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Per Truco9311. iMatthew (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - New tag team, no relevant. Remember, we'll create Mark Henry and Big Daddy V, Eugene and Shannon Moore, Kane and CM Punk, John Morrison and The Miz, Chris Benoit and Kurt Angle, Matt Hardy and MVP, and a few more.... --KingOfDX (talk) 05:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of those you listed, only Morrison and Miz have been a regular tag team (meaning most of their matches are tag matches). Yang and Moore have competed on almost only tag team matches for the last several months. TJ Spyke 06:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per Adamaniac and KingofDX. Nikki311 03:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP - going for tag title tomorrow night.--72.186.91.47 (talk) 06:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- bulletproof ^3:16 06:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with the possibility of recreation later. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Based on current standards, theya re certainly notable enough to have an article, but overall I feel like we have too many tag team articles that could fit into wrestlers main page.LessThanClippers (talk) 23:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as of last show they were reffered to by an actual team name "The Redneck and the Reject" —Preceding unsigned comment added by LessThanClippers (talk • contribs) 23:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.