The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shalford Football Club[edit]

Amateur village football team which does not meet GNG or the WP:FOOTY project rule of thumb of having competed in the top 10 levels of the English football league system or in a national cup competition. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This club obviously falls below the commonly accepted level. I also notice that much of this article is a copyvio and there's very little in the way of available third-party sources to make this club in any way notable. Bettia (rawr!) 14:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bettia said it all really. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 17:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bettia. Giant Snowman 18:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Shame know, My Uncle played for this team during the 60s. :) Govvy (talk) 23:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete! It's a club with over a hundred years of history and they may not have played in the top 10 tiers but they're in the 11th right now! Sometimes the people on Wikipedia can be such tosspots. (I apologise for my bad language but I'm clearly not that articulate...) Oh, and if you're going to have an article about the league Shalford are in then why not have one about each of the clubs in that league? Seems a bit silly to me. Could be that the league doesn't meet your RoT in which case I understand completely now and you should probably delete that too... Ms331 (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply I know it can be annoying but Wiki has a criteria of what a notable club should be and by those rules this team shouldn't have an article. Govvy (talk) 22:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.