The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:26, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shake (ride)[edit]

Shake (ride) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Unsourced. Unable to locate substantial coverage needed. (Prod removed without explanation.) SummerPhD (talk) 05:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been notified to WikiProject Amusement Parks. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 11:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Even if sources exist, it would be better served as part of the Mondial article as opposed to being a standalone article. --GoneIn60 (talk) 10:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I've added a ref but the notability of the ride is not that "strong". If the article could be expanded to prove that the article is notable, then maybe I would say its notable.--Dom497 (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.