The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shafi Group[edit]

Shafi Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage found. Fails WP:NCORP. Greenbörg (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep---This article was unreferenced since 2008. I just expanded the article with 5 new references and 3 external links using international magazines and newspapers. Looked hard enough to find a lot of in-depth coverage. This is a major conglomerate company of Pakistan and a leading exporter of leather goods (leather shoes, handbags, leather jackets) with major brand name clients in Europe and North America. So there was a lot of info and references there that I could use.Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:43, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with the sources you added. This article fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Notability is not inherited so if sources are discussing Muhammad Naseem Shafi then we should have article on him rather on his group. Greenbörg (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - coverage fails WP:GNG. I can't find any recent significant coverage in notable third party sources - it's just local trade pubs, and dated at that. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per timtempleton Fails WP:CORPDEPTH could not find significant coverage in notable third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete. I didn't do any searching on my own (hence my weak modifier), I just looked at the references currently in the article. None of them struck me as meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. I saw a couple of perfunctory directory-type listings (Bloomberg, Business Recorder), and a couple of shallow pieces in industry publications (Leather International Magazine). The Dawn reference looks like it's an incorrect URL, but in any case, the title of the referenced article doesn't sound promising. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.