The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A user added a CSD. It doesn't meet that criteria, but I'm not letting the article off the hook just yet. LAAFansign review 22:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. A single mention, and that's a press release in google news. Comment by User:VasileGaburici. Sorry, my bad google fu, so keep. VG ☎ 12:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure I understand the problem with the wikipedia SevOne page. It offers a neutral viewpoint and gives a reader a basic understanding of what SevOne is. I have read the Wikipedia: Deletion policy (Reasons for deletion) and do not see a reason for the SevOne page to be killed off. Other pages that are very similar to the SevOne page that are not in danger of deletion are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netqos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bentley_Systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSFS_Bank
I can not see a difference between these pages and the SevOne page. Please let me know what actions I need to take to insure that the SevOne page remains on Wikipedia.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwmetz (talk • contribs) 13:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]