The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete then redirect to Scrum (software development)#Scrum Master. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scrum Master[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemed CSD-able but unclear which it would fall under. Unclear why it merits a stand-alone article beyond those that already exist like the several articles we already have related to Scrum, Fiedler contingency model. Also problematic unencyclopedic tone with several WP:NOT issues (i.e. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide or manual) and seems vaguely promotional. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Firstly, it is absolutely unclear what the article is about, at one point I thought it was about Rugby, then leadership, and now have no idea. Secondly, two of the references are the same. I will fix this issue, but it does then leave the article still being almost unintelligible, and only having two references.

Edit Having read the section on "Agile" in the article, this section does not seem to fit in with the rest of the article, at least, as far as I can understand the article.

Edited: m8e39 14:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

m8e39 13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete I'm a Certified Scrum Master. I don't recognise a word of this and trying to read it makes my eyes hurt. Burn it, start again. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Scrum (software development)#Scrum Master. As written, the article is poorly sourced and lacks context and cohesion. Also, there is already a Fiedler contingency model article, which has its own problems.- Mr X 14:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect - I see a couple of places where this might redirect to. Scrum in Marketing Department and Scrum (software development) are proposed to be merged with each other. Until that happens...eenie meanie miney moe it I guess. The article is a hot mess. I have no idea what's going on. Bali88 (talk) 00:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrum in Marketing Department Andy Dingley (talk) 08:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also

Seems there's a rash of these things lately. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect Any useful material should be merged into Scrum (software development). Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Then Redirect to Scrum (software development)#Scrum Master. Incoherent and unstructured as well as in contravention of what Wikipedia is not Looks like thinly veiled promotion for the main reference supplied, which is a career development website and certainly not reliable.
Delete per nom and as minimally intelligible conslutant[sic]-speak. --Finngall ^talk 22:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.