The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable per substantial coverage in reliable sources. Worth including in the encyclopedia. Certainly could be improved.. How did biggest loser version become healthier? Candleabracadabra (talk) 06:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG - Seems covered in sources here and there, good to stay. --cyclopiaspeak! 13:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.