The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:BLPPROD, which expired before the discussion reached a consensus. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scientist DP Sharma Jaipur[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria, potential BLP issues, article creator rmv AfD template previously with no consensus reached that I can find. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 20:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 01:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hopeless, no sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.