The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mz7 (talk) 04:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific communism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page has existed for ten years without having references. Benjamin5152414 (talk) 02:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. So add sources. There have been several books written on the subject. --Michig (talk) 07:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP and "article content does not determine notability", agree with Michig above, plenty of books cover this, here are a couple - Fundamentals of Scientific Communism and Scientific Communism. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Having no sources is not a reason to delete an article, especially when the subject is clearly notable. Benjamin5152414, please consider withdrawing this nomination, and please follow WP:BEFORE in the future. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.