The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 19:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schwagstock[edit]

Schwagstock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Schwagstock gets 502 g-hits. This article is basically a promotional brochure for the concert - it tells us the schedule for the event, has a visitors' guide telling you where you can eat and what the dog policy is, and has photos from previous events. BigDT 17:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, nn local rock fest. Edeans 22:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete too spammy and only one source provided. If the article is cleaned up and another source or two added my opinion could easily change. Keep Addhoc's improvements show the event is well documented and the article no longer reads like an advert. It's not the biggest event in the world but has a history better than some.Nuttah68 16:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 20:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Addhoc 15:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above search indicating sufficient news coverage. Addhoc 16:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.