The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow/speedy delete G1/A7; take your pick. - Daniel.Bryant 09:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested speedy delete. This is probably the work of a vandal, and a clear violation of WP:NEO.
Also nominating Scabby (currently tagged for speedy delete) from the same author Caknuck 08:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Should have been speedied anyway. --Chris 08:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, nonsense. Tagged as such. Speedy is not WP:PROD; the author isn't supposed to remove the tag, and you can put it back if they do. Dave6talk 08:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Author tried to assert notability on the discussion page, which is why I brought it here. I figured it'd be a quick consensus. Caknuck 08:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.