The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saratoga County Airport[edit]

Saratoga County Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A small county airport. Article is very difficult to read, and seems to be a list of 'features', most of which are not explained, and would not make sense to somebody who was not familiar on the subject. FusionMix 21:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, NN general aviation airport[1] with no tower and dawn-dusk operation. --Dhartung | Talk 21:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep improved article. --Dhartung | Talk 05:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I don't see any possibility of even making this article a decent stub. The Alan Smithee (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and clean-up. Airports are notable and like the hundreds (perhaps thousands) of existing Wikipedia airport articles, this can easily be cleaned up to be a decent stub. See similar Half Moon Bay Airport for a good example. Serves the 25,000+ city of Saratoga Springs, New York. --Oakshade (talk) 21:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Earlier in my Wikipedia "career" I was happy to delete rivers, streams, towns, schools, etc. which did not seem notable. But the consensus seems to be that certain kinds of things are inherently notable, so now I go with the flow. Airports are one of those kinds. There are lots more airport stubs like this one. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I renamed the article "Saratoga County Airport." --Oakshade (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Oakshade has turned the article into a decent stub for a regional airport. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. All public-use airports are notable. This was just an article that needed renaming and some improvements, not deletion. I have expanded the article by adding statistics and a references section, plus a link to the airport's page in the New York State DOT Airport Directory. At this point I'd say it certainly meets the "decent stub" criteria mentioned previously. -- Zyxw (talk) 02:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

♠Return to Original Page.I believe the reason the page was created was to create a reference for pilots. If worse came to worse, they would have somewhere to go. Just because the type is not understandable to everyone, doesn't make it worthless. I liked it as it was, as it was true, and had some important information on it.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.