The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G4, recreation of a recently deleted topic, plus G5, by an obvious sockpuppet of the prior creator. -- ferret (talk) 20:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarasaland (Empire)[edit]

Sarasaland (Empire) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional empire that does not pass WP:GNG, the coverage cited in the article is a mixture of in-universe information, passing mentions and unreliable sources. A search uncovered nothing better. This article was also deleted less than a week and a half ago at Sarasaland Kingdoms. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Per WP:G4._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete probably qualifies as a speedy delete Dexxtrall (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - The article would be an obvious deletion due to not passing the WP:GNG regardless, but this is an obvious attempt at circumventing the just-closed deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarasaland Kingdoms. Should be Speedy Deleted under WP:G4 rather than being given the full week at AFD. Rorshacma (talk) 15:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Is it identical? or substantially so? Then G4 indeed applies. But just because a topic was deleted, doesn't mean that a newly recreated article on the same topic, by whatever name, is G4-eligible just in case the same criteria apply. Jclemens (talk) 16:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. _signed, Iflaq ^(talk) 16:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• *Why Is It Being Deleted? Did I do something wrong?TheCraziestNintendoFan (talk) 21:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For starters, are you not a sockpuppet of Error 365, and that you essentially copied and pasted deleted content from Sarasaland Kingdoms which you also was a primary author of? Haleth (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I can reassure you I am not Error 365 nor was I primary author of the article Sarasaland Kingdoms Though it may seem that I am that person, this is just a coincidence and I am not Error 365.

TheCraziestNintendoFan (talk) 12:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Haleth, WP:SPI? Or just ping some SPI-active admin? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• It's up to you, I suppose. I only ever posted on SPI board once. I don't know a particular admin who is SPI-active though. Either way, I'm unconvinced by this editor who is entirely lacking in subtlety. Haleth (talk) 23:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per WP:G4, this doesn't even need to be at AfD. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:G4. Aoba47 (talk) 03:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per everyone. Can AfD not be reverted immediately in favor of that? — Smuckola(talk) 05:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.