The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. PeaceNT 01:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SalvosConnect[edit]

SalvosConnect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Finishing unfinished nom made by anon; I abstain. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 03:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete per lack of significant coverage from independent sources. Corpx 05:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this article does not meet notability requirements IMHO. Anynobody 00:19, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Carlossuarez46 23:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Corpx. If the Salvation Army Australia had an article, I would suggest merging, but they don't seem to. The information is too specific for inclusion on The Salvation Army general article. --Moonriddengirl 14:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.