The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sakima.Ivy.NET[edit]

Sakima.Ivy.NET (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PRODUCT requirements as there are no independent sources establishing notability and I can find no Google News history of any mention of this server or its prior identity of sakima.octoraro.org. Ash (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Seems like a history of a non notable email server. Mattg82 (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable email server; per above. Airplaneman ^talk 02:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.