- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Saint Damien Advocates[edit]
- Saint Damien Advocates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure advocacy on an advocacy group; the response to my tag for POV concerns was to add more quotes from the organization, thus increasing the problem. DGG ( talk ) 22:28, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The organization is not even remotely notable, and the article is pure POV. --MelanieN (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The organization fails WP:ORG, and the Wikipedia page is basically being used as free web hosting for its political opinions. Lagrange613 12:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems more adverty, requires that wonderful "fundamental rewrite". Most of the references seem to have been duplicated and repeated - and above and beyond I don't see it even coming remotely close to passing WP:GNG Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per above and fails WP:ORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.