The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sachi Wickramage[edit]

Sachi Wickramage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines in WP:BIO. The article looks like promotional material for the individual and his business. The biographical content ("Life and career" section) contains only two inline references, both of which look like they are connected to the subject. obi2canibetalk contr 20:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12],AnGeloAnoJan (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources are about the product/company, they only mention Wickramage in passing. That isn't the the in-depth coverage required by WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO.--obi2canibetalk contr 12:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
AnGeloAnoJan - None of these sources assert notability of the person. These may assert notability of the company, but it is the article subject himself that this AFD thread must examine. WP:GNG requires reliable sources that cover the article subject in-depth, and that enough reliable sources exist to provide significant coverage, or coverage to where no original research is needed to cover the article subject in its entirety. This clearly does not exist; the article looks to be full of original research, and what sources are cited do not meet the standards required of WP:RS and WP:GNG. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.