The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine Jamieson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BLP1E. Sources available are merely routine coverage of Australia's Next Top Model and indicate the subject is only notable for her appearance as a contestant on the series (which she did not win). At the least, the article contravenes WP:TOOSOON. Linguist ^talk|contribs 15:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Linguist ^talk|contribs 15:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Linguist ^talk|contribs 15:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Linguist ^talk|contribs 15:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable model, Can't find any evidence of notability, Fails NMODEL & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable model. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 20:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at this time. While extensively covered, coverage is narrow in scope. 1E and TOOSOON. Aoziwe (talk) 12:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.