The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saal.ai[edit]

Saal.ai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable but actively self-promoting corporation. Google search shows no third-party or independent coverage, only considerable promotion marked by the use of a lot of buzzwords. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – It isn’t clear whether Saal refers to the company or its products. It probably doesn’t matter, because it doesn’t satisfy corporate notability, software notability, or product notability. Most of the puffery has been removed from this article more than once, but the following remains, which illustrates the overall tone of the article:

 By using the power of NLP (Text), Computer vision (Image), Automatic Speech Recognition (Speech) and drawing inspiration from Neuroscience and Philosophy, Saal is able to accomplish any goal. 

Even after a considerable effort to trim out the buzzspeak, what is left is still a sales job. There is no evidence that the company is notable, but even if it is, the article needs to be blown up.

• Delete I made an attempt to remove most of the blatantly promotional content (and reverted to this after persistent restoration of it), but agree that there is no evidence of notability and WP:TNT is the best course of action. Melcous (talk) 00:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The author has been indeffed for undisclosed paid editing and sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• If deleted, please also delete the redirected related pages mentioned at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Saal.ai. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Refs don't support notability. Szzuk (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Pretty clear from the language used that the 2 references provided are not independent, and so there is no evidence of notability. Layer on the COI issues and the promotional language, and Deletion is a pretty natural outcome. No ill will towards saal.ai; I wish them the best in their field and WP will be happy to have an article on the company where there is enough independent, reputable, secondary sources discussing the company; and said article is written in keeping with WP:PAID. Martinp (talk) 03:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.