The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SW postcode area#SW19. Star Mississippi 01:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SW19[edit]

SW19 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary disambiguation page. None of the articles has a title "SW19". The given source - incorrect on a disambiguation page - refers to the location, not to the tournament. The Banner talk 21:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/1147243/Where-is-Wimbledon-why-is-it-called-SW19-reason-explained
  2. https://www.chaseyoursport.com/Tennis/Why-is-Wimbledon-Championships-Also-Known-as-SW19/1027
  3. https://www.essentiallysports.com/why-is-wimbledon-championships-called-sw19/

Anticipating objections, indeed these sources are not good enough for notability, but please note that is not the test for a disambig page. CT55555 (talk) 22:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source from BBC referring to it as "SW19" https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/tennis/40545727 from Talk:SW19. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 23:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The BBC source does not directly confirm that SW19 is a synonym for the Wimbledon championships. SpinningSpark 17:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment But Flushing Meadow doesn't lead to a tennis tournament. (Roland Garros is a dab page). PamD 18:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SW19 may refer to:
(ie We include a comment which will be seen by editors but not readers, referring them to a note on the talk page which gives the reference cited, possibly others, and refers to this discussion/decision. Too much time has been wasted over the years on this helpful small dab page. PamD 08:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC) Changed, PamD 18:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @PamD: To make this dab compliant, "SW19" needs to be mentioned in the target article (which it currently isn't for the tennis) and the reference should be at that mention, not on a dab talk page. Dab pages do not have references for the reason that they should not be saying anything that is not in the articles. Slightly off topic, the ref given makes a huge meal of a very simple explanation and probably isn't RS.SpinningSpark 17:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was proposing a slightly WP:IAR solution, having had the mistaken impression that this redirect/dab had been the subject of discussion off and on for ages - but I now see it's only a very recent conversion to a dab page by one editor. Quite happy for it to revert to the redirect to the postal area, and for the many links (one in address of every champsionship) which have been removed to all be reinstated. PamD 18:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To make this dab compliant, "SW19" needs to be mentioned in the target article. Is that so? There is a list of cities at Big Smoke, and their pages don't mention that nickname as far as I could see. Vpab15 (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, WP:DABRELATED. SpinningSpark 20:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.