The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SOUIT[edit]

SOUIT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Article is about a neologism, with no reliable sources provided or found. Google search for the entire term (Service Oriented User Interface Technology) returns two results - both from Wikipedia. TNXMan 20:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable neologism, nom is exactly right.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 20:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a neologism per WP:NEO; lack of significant coverage by reliable third parties. Cocytus [»talk«] 04:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO Even the web site stated to have coined the term states it should be used "so that the movement can gain pace" and appears as a vanity web page as seen here. Also can not find any secondary reliable sources Calmer Waters 08:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Neologism that has not caught on. --Apoc2400 (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.