- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SoWhy 14:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- SATUMA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No in-depth coverage found. Fails WP:NCORP. Greenbörg (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to meet WP:GNG, its products are used by the Pakistani military [1] [2] Mar4d (talk) 12:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Have a look at WP:INHERITORG which says 'No inherited notability'. Subject fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Greenbörg (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nomination. Adamgerber80 (talk) 04:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing++ 14:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.