The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete for insufficient context by Anthony.bradbury; non-admin closure. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 21:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

S.W.O.R.D[edit]

S.W.O.R.D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not at all notable. Is there a speedy-tag for this? --Aktsu ^(t / c) 07:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Complete lack of WP:RS, probably due to non-notability. Movingboxes (talk) 07:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, probably WP:SNOW. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 08:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFT -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per NFT. Ironholds 08:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the disambiguation page at S.W.O.R.D. (note the extra period) as a plausible typo. -- saberwyn 08:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There is no assertion of notability, and a quick google turns up nothing that relates to a novel called The Fallen with those characters. It appears to be what others are indicating - "something made up in school one day". SilkTork *^YES! 09:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Falls under the "Not for things made up in school one day" criteria. Probably didn't need to be sent to AFD; could have been PROD'ed or speedied at the outset. 23skidoo (talk) 14:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete with full knowledge that it doesn't technically fit any of the criteria, but come on, characters from "a book being written by 2 high school students" is as deletable an article as Wikipedia has ever seen. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for any number of reasons (WP:MADEUP, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:RS WP:V and WP:NOTE all spring to mind!) -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 16:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.