The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Monihan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Request for speedy deletion rejected as notability is asserted but there is very little notability asserted. There are no sources cited so as it stands this is Original Research and the article therefore fails WP:V. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He is an actual skateboarder...--LtWinters 20:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Just because something is "true" does not make it encyclopedic. Morgan Wick 23:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -unless properly verified and notability is made clear. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 21:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Lots of people are actual skateboarders, that doesn't mean they rate an encyclopedia article. Looks to be more promotional than attempting to give any reason why anyone would care. DreamGuy 21:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.