The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ruthless (Ace Hood album)[edit]

Unsourced speculation. Fails WP:CRYSTAL. PROD was removed. --Ged UK 10:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only source is YouTube, which we all know is an unreliable source. --Dylan 620 _{Wishes you a Happy Easter!} 10:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why delete it when its sourced by Ace Hood himself? ♣ Makaveli ♣ 15:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 14:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums & WP:CRYSTAL. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. There's nothing here that doesn't warrant more than a passing mention in the parent article. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I say delete it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.183.172 (talk) 07:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm against a deletion. This article's sources can be improved. There are enough album articles that are not even sourced. --DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: notability yet to be established, no reliable coverage, WP:CRYSTAL. JamesBurns (talk) 01:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: two primary sources and one youtube video. Youtube not a reliable source.TechOutsider (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.