The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rousseau Metal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement and fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 21:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Do not delete - Inventions seem enough for notability. I would ask for better sources of notability and require some of the hype removed, but leave the basic article. פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 21:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What inventions? The Banner talk 22:41, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Not seeing much out there other than a Hydro Quebec newsletter article. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 05:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree that it fails WP:CORP in general. All the web sources on the article either don't exist or fail WP:CORPDEPTH. ALH (talk) 09:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.