The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rossland Warriors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010 with no sources. Fails WP:NTEAM and WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 16:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey and Canada. UtherSRG (talk) 16:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per the nomination. Senior ice hockey was crazy popular in the time period this league existed. It may be a good idea to nominate the rest of the teams for deletion. IncompA 18:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - senior hockey received vast amounts of coverage in Canadian newspapers in the era this team was active. --Hockeyben ^{(talk - contribs)} 23:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, you have another week to provide some reliable sources as the article is currently unsourced.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - A Newspapers.com search reveals an absolute treasure-trove of coverage, obviously a lot of it is WP:Routine, but quite a lot of it is good enough, I don't see an issue with GNG. I have added a few sources to the article where helpful. This article needs work, but WP:DINC, willing to put in more work for research provided this article isn't going to be nuked immediately. Cheers, IceBergYYC (talk) 22:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to review added sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - they appear to still be active, having won the Coy Cup in 2007. https://www.proquest.com/docview/358177032/11D87318F9BC4D4BPQ/2, https://www.proquest.com/docview/358123609/11D87318F9BC4D4BPQ/1, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2639214365/11D87318F9BC4D4BPQ/5, etc. - Indefensible (talk) 03:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.